Why is goodwill not tax-deductible in a plain stock acquisition, but it becomes deductible over 15 years in an asset acquisition or under a 338(h)(10) election? What does this imply for the after-tax cost of the acquisition?
AdvancedModel answer
In a stock purchase, the buyer is acquiring stock, not the underlying assets. The target's tax basis in its assets remains unchanged. Goodwill is not a separate tax asset; it simply represents the premium over identifiable net assets and has no tax basis. Only when there is an actual or deemed asset purchase does the buyer get a step-up in the tax basis of the assets acquired, and any excess purchase price over the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible assets is allocated to goodwill for tax purposes. This tax goodwill is amortizable over 15 years under Section 197, providing annual tax deductions that reduce cash taxes. As a result, the after-tax cost of the acquisition is lower with a step-up. For example, a $100 million of tax-deductible goodwill generates $100M/15 = $6.67 million annual deduction, saving $6.67M * tax rate in cash taxes each year. The present value of those savings can be significant and often motivates the buyer to seek a 338(h)(10) election.
Follow-up pressure: (1) If the target is a C corp and a 338(h)(10) is not used, what is the typical structure to achieve a step-up, and what is the double taxation cost? (2) How would you calculate the breakeven purchase price increase a buyer would accept to obtain a 338(h)(10) election, given specific assumptions about cost of debt and tax rate? (3) Why might a seller reject a 338(h)(10) election even if the buyer offers a higher price?
This is an advanced Superday-level question with a full model answer, part of IB Atlas's practice bank.
Start freeRelated topics
- Explain how purchase accounting treats a target's deferred revenue balance at closing. Why does this almost always reduce goodwill, and what is the post-close revenue implication?
- Compare a stock acquisition with a 338(h)(10) election to a direct asset acquisition from the buyer's perspective. Discuss operational and tax considerations, and explain why a buyer might choose 338(h)(10) over an asset deal for an S corp target.
- What is a tuck-in / bolt-on acquisition, and why does its value creation come primarily from multiple arbitrage and operating leverage rather than standalone growth?
- Why is 'this deal is accretive' not the same statement as 'this is a good deal'? Give a one-sentence explanation an MD would accept.
- Walk me through how each of the three financing sources (cash on hand, new debt, and new stock) affects pro forma EPS, and where each one shows up in the accretion/dilution build.