The 338(h)(10) Election, Explained
The question
Compare a stock acquisition with a 338(h)(10) election to a direct asset acquisition from the buyer's perspective. Discuss operational and tax considerations, and explain why a buyer might choose 338(h)(10) over an asset deal for an S corp target.
General educational practice only. This is not an actual, confidential, leaked, or firm-provided interview question. Check important technical details against primary learning materials.
Study explanation
In a direct asset acquisition, the buyer purchases individual assets and assumes specified liabilities. This provides a full step-up in tax basis and avoids any DTL. However, it requires renegotiating assignment of every contract, lease, and license, as well as obtaining third-party consents. It can be operationally burdensome and may trigger change-of-control provisions.
In a 338(h)(10) election, the buyer acquires the stock, so the legal transfer is simple, but a deemed asset sale occurs for tax purposes. The buyer still gets a step-up, tax-deductible goodwill, and no DTL. For an S corp, the seller's gain on the deemed asset sale flows through to shareholders and is taxed only once, avoiding the double taxation that a C corp faces in an asset deal.
The buyer might accept the election and pay a small premium to compensate the seller for immediate tax recognition in exchange for future tax amortization benefits. The buyer also avoids the operational complexity of an asset deal.
Follow-up pressure:
- What is the tax treatment of the target's NOLs under a 338(h)(10) election versus a plain stock deal?
- If the target is a C corporation, why is a 338(h)(10) election typically avoided, and what is the closest alternative?
- How would you quantify the value to the buyer of making this election, and what key assumptions drive that calculation?
Accretion / dilution
| Acquirer standalone net income | 300 |
| + Target net income | 80 |
| + After-tax synergies | 15 |
| − After-tax incremental interest | (10) |
| Pro forma combined net income | 385 |
| Acquirer standalone EPS | $3.00 |
| Pro forma share count | 125 |
| Pro forma EPS | $3.08 |
| Accretion | 2.7% |
This is a synthesized challenge prompt with a study explanation. It is not represented as a question from any firm or interview.
Start freeGet all 125 practice prompts as one PDF.
General educational prompts with study explanations for offline review. They are not firm-provided or confidential questions.
Keep going
- Negative Goodwill in a Bargain Buy, Explained
- Deferred Revenue Write-Downs in M&A, Explained
- Bolt-On Acquisitions, Explained
- Why is 'this deal is accretive' not the same statement as 'this is a good deal'? Give a one-sentence explanation an MD would accept.
- Financing Mix and Pro Forma EPS, Explained
- Guide: M&A terms study guide
The rest of this topic
Purchase accounting: goodwill, write-ups and the tax basis