A $400M high-yield bond in an LBO has non-call 3, then callable at 104.5 in year 4, 102.25 in year 5, and par thereafter. The sponsor is considering an exit at the end of year 2 and at the end of year 4. For each exit timing, explain how the bond is treated in the exit enterprise value to equity bridge. If the sponsor wants to deliver the company debt-free to a buyer in year 4, what additional cash cost is incurred?
AdvancedModel answer
Answer:
For a year 2 exit, the bond is within its non-call period and cannot be prepaid at par without potentially incurring a large make-whole premium. In the model, the bond is assumed to remain outstanding and is subtracted from exit EV (along with any other debt) to arrive at equity proceeds. The buyer acquires the company subject to that debt.
For a year 4 exit, the bond becomes callable at 104.5% of par. If the sponsor wishes to extinguish the bond to deliver a debt-free company, it must pay $400M × 1.045 = $418M, a premium of $18M. This premium reduces equity proceeds dollar-for-dollar. The cost is modeled as an additional use of cash at exit: exit net debt = TLB + bond redemption cost (not face value). The equity value under a debt-free sale is (EV minus TLB minus $418M) rather than (EV minus TLB minus $400M). A buyer would adjust the purchase price accordingly.
Follow-up pressure:
- "What is the typical rationale for a sponsor to sell a company with the existing debt in place rather than redeeming it? How does this affect the buyer's financing?"
- "If the bond was trading at 95 in the secondary market in year 4, how could the sponsor take advantage of that to reduce the exit cost? What are the practical limitations?"
- "Explain what an equity clawback provision is and how it could allow early partial redemption of the bond even during the non-call period."
This is an advanced Superday-level question with a full model answer, part of IB Atlas's practice bank.
Start freeRelated topics
- An LBO capital structure includes a $150M PIK toggle note with a 9% coupon and a $300M TLB with a 6% cash interest rate and 2% mandatory amortization on the original $300M. In Year 1, the company elects to pay 4% cash interest on the PIK note and 5% via PIK. Free cash flow before debt service is $110M. Calculate the Year 1 end balance of the TLB under (a) this partial-PIK election and (b) a scenario where the company pays the full 9% in cash. Explain why the net debt at year-end is the same under both scenarios, but the composition of debt differs, and why a sponsor might prefer one over the other.
- A sponsor arranges a $500M term loan that is issued at 97 (3% OID). The equity check is $300M. Transaction fees total $25M, and the target has no existing debt or excess cash. What is the implied enterprise value of the acquisition? Explain how the OID is accounted for in the sources & uses and how it subsequently impacts the P&L and cash flow.
- Explain why debt paydown is a real source of equity value creation even when it requires no operational improvement to the business at all.
- Why must total sources equal total uses in an LBO, and is this an accounting identity or a real economic constraint? Explain the difference.
- What is the difference between Term Loan A and Term Loan B in terms of buyer base, amortization, and covenant package?