A company has 200 million basic shares outstanding. Its share price is $50. There are 20 million options struck at $40, 5 million warrants struck at $55, and $300 million of convertible bonds that convert into 6 million shares (conversion price $50). Compute the fully diluted share count and explain your treatment of each security.
AdvancedModel answer
Options are in-the-money ($50 > $40). Under the treasury stock method: Net new shares from options = 20m − (20m × $40 / $50) = 20m − 16m = 4 million shares. Warrants are out-of-the-money because the strike ($55) exceeds the current price ($50). They are antidilutive and excluded from diluted shares. Convertible bonds: the conversion price is $50, equal to the share price. At the money, I would include the conversion shares under the if-converted method, assuming conversion occurs, so add 6 million shares. Total diluted shares = 200m basic + 4m option dilution + 6m convert dilution = 210 million shares.
If asked to be precise, I would note that the TSM only applies to options/warrants; for converts, we use the if-converted method, adding back the after-tax interest saved. However, when the conversion price equals current price, the dilutive effect is simply the conversion shares.
Follow-up pressure:
- How would your answer change if the convertible had a cash settlement feature and the company’s credit spread widened? Would you still use the if-converted method?
- If the warrants had a $1 exercise price and represented 30% of the current share base, would you still apply the TSM blindly? What alternative method might be more appropriate?
- Explain why we ignore out-of-the-money instruments under current GAAP and when that assumption becomes misleading.
This is an advanced Superday-level question with a full model answer, part of IB Atlas's practice bank.
Start freeRelated topics
- Walk me through the full enterprise-value bridge for a company that consolidates a subsidiary with a 30% noncontrolling interest, carries a $200 million net pension liability on its balance sheet, owns a 25% equity-method stake in an associate valued on its books at $150 million, and has $60 million of operating lease liabilities that are not classified as finance leases under US GAAP. Include your rationale for every adjustment.
- Why is it inconsistent to add an operating-lease liability to enterprise value while using a reported EBITDA that includes the lease rent expense, and what precise adjustment eliminates the inconsistency?
- Why do you subtract cash when calculating enterprise value? Give both the practical (acquirer) reason and the conceptual (non-operating asset) reason.
- Why is minority interest added to enterprise value? Anchor your answer in consolidation accounting and the consistency of EV/EBITDA.
- Why is EV/EBITDA considered capital-structure neutral, while P/E is not?